By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy Stop & Go The Stop And Go Getting To The Other Side The Pimp Walk ... Tous les albums - Bohannon Que sont devenus les membres de Queen ? Although Bohannon argues that "open access has multiplied that underclass of journals", I would like to counter that it is only through a history of masking editorial processes amid claims of "value added" that we have arrived at this mess. le 30/12/2019. Geographic | Stevan Harnad | MSN nl | The Telegraph India | Jacob Kastrenakes on The Verge | Michelle Meyer (Harvard Law) | Brian Wood (comparison with impact factors) | Bob O’Hara in The Guardian | Philip Moriarty at physics focus | Ulrich Herb | Gavia Libraria (on alternatives) | Gary Daught | Alessandro Delfanti | Science @ORF | Adam G. Dunn | Fernando Blanco | chat session with John Bohannon, Michael Eisen and David Roos | Graham Steel on Figshare blog | Neurobonkers I and II | NRC 1 but later 2 (for UU only) | De Volkskrant 1 but later 2 (for UU only) | Mark Liberman on Language Log | DOAJ (second reaction) | John Bohannon (reaction to the reactions), [a slightly different and updated version of this post has been published in Dutch in the Utrecht University online magazine DUB: http://www.dub.uu.nl/artikel/opinie/science-testte-vooral-slechte-tijdschriften.html], Pingback: John Bohannon’s peer-review sting against Science | Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week, Pingback: Science Mag sting of OA journals: is it about Open Access or about peer review? Sadly, these two sentences appear at the very end of the article. You can be assured our editors closely monitor every feedback sent and will take appropriate actions. Bohannan’s selection of journals to submit his paper to is based on the Directory of Open Access Journals. and Terms of Use. But there is a growing movement to make this knowledge freely available. Even within the selection of English language, fee-asking, life science, OA journals a random choice of journals might have given completely different results. What’s the use of that knowledge without evaluating the papers written by female students? Some of the Open Access journals with failing peer review are owned by reputed traditional publishers such as Elsevier, Sage and Kluwer. Also, choosing one journal per publisher is in any case a poor way to sample journal space, as there is such a long tail of very small publishers which make the result unrepresentative. Groet, roos, Pingback: Open Access journal scandal-the replies | Erik Champion. nteractive map with all results and email correspondence, chat session with John Bohannon, Michael Eisen and David Roos, http://www.dub.uu.nl/artikel/opinie/science-testte-vooral-slechte-tijdschriften.html, John Bohannon’s peer-review sting against Science | Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week, Science Mag sting of OA journals: is it about Open Access or about peer review? Pingback: Peer review, stings and editors | Ferniglab's Blog, Pingback: Thinking about output and health and safety. More than half of those journals accepted the bogus manuscript, which was riddled with ethical approval problems and scientific anomalies. Bohannon says he considered a broader sting including journals from all types of publishers, but decided to focus on Open Access publishers only to save time. or, by Martin Eve, The Conversation. It's about a flawed system of trusting journals and the inherent problems in peer review, but he targets only open access here. But I found some glaring problems with the article and its premises. Bijwerken ), Je reageert onder je Twitter account. And some Open Access journals did perform rigorous review and rejected the paper, such as PLoS One and a  journal from Hindawi. He moved to Detroit in early 1960s and worked as sideman of Stevie Wonder between 1965 and 1967. Houd me via e-mail op de hoogte van nieuwe reacties. It would seem that Bohannon has neatly demonstrated a fatal flaw in open access publishing. Nearly all the submissions were rejected. There is something rotten in the state of Open Access publishers, but is it better in the world of traditional publishers? He writes: Some say that the open-access model itself is not to blame for the poor quality control revealed by Science's investigation. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no Thank you for taking your time to send in your valued opinion to Science X editors. Bohannon should be complimented for revealing these patterns. So, this study shows there are 157 Open Access journals with failing peer review. He submitted articles only to open access journals. In short, by making the selections, chances are high that (unintentionally) Bohannon focussed on a group with a relatively many rotten apples. That’s it, and that is serious enough. That seems very serious and it is. Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox, Research paper publishing sting reveals lax standards of many open-access journals, phys.org/news/2013-10-paper-pu … s-lax-standards.html, How the appreciation of beauty can foster perceptual learning, Evidence found of link between gut microbe deficiency and autism spectrum disorder, Researchers find that patients with acne have reduced expression of the protein GATA6, An algorithm that predicts the chances of a person with a latent infection developing tuberculosis, Study of chess player performance over many years suggests brain peaks at age 35. While he acknowledges that the top players (including the journal PLOS ONE) provided rigorous review, Bohannon submitted his bogus paper mostly to poor journals. Science Mag sting of OA journals: is it about Open Access or about peer review? In the article “Who’s afraid of peer review?” John Bohannon, a contributing correspondent to Science, tells how he concocted a fake article and submitted that to hundreds of Open Access journals. | Open Access Belgium. The key problem, however, lies in two sentences, tucked away in Bohannon's coda. Out of 255 papers that underwent the entire process from submitting to acceptance or rejection, 157 were accepted and 98 rejected. And if you dive into the interactive map with all results and email correspondence, bank account locations and more you’ll find a lot of interesting stuff that lays bare how predatory publishers try to gain or maintain their status. Pingback: What Science — and the Gonzo Scientist — got wrong: open access will make research better, Pingback: Flawed Science Story “Stings” Open Access | University Library Blog, Pingback: Bohannon’s Science Sting – playing devil’s advocate and proposing a solution | adamgdunn, Hoi Jeroen, dank voor je werk en het delen met ons! Houd me via e-mail op de hoogte van nieuwe berichten. The harsh truth is that Bohannon's article is hostile. Deden maar meer mensen dat. His argument seems to be that, because of their business model, some journals are biased towards accepting scientific articles, regardless of their quality. Bijwerken ), Je reageert onder je Google account. Sadly, Bohannon's operation adds little to what we already know. In short, Bohannon's article isn't really about open access. The larger publishers such as BioMed Central, Hindawi, Elsevier and Sage had dozens of appropriate journals he might have submitted the article to, but he only chose one per publisher. Bijwerken ). They all claimed to be peer-reviewed journals, but many of them didn't bother to do any sort of review. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Medical Xpress in any form. This introduced a bias, because all publishers who are just in it to make easy money are concentrated in this group and not in the 75% that does not charge. | Open Access Belgium, What Science — and the Gonzo Scientist — got wrong: open access will make research better, Flawed Science Story “Stings” Open Access | University Library Blog, Bohannon’s Science Sting – playing devil’s advocate and proposing a solution | adamgdunn, Open Access journal scandal-the replies | Erik Champion, Peer review, stings and editors | Ferniglab's Blog, Thinking about output and health and safety. Then he became responsible for live arrangements for all Motown’s top acts.

Dulhan Wahi Jo Piya Man Bhaye Youtube, Hail Season Colorado 2019, 1987 Dodge Charger, Kake News Anchor Attacked, No Wonder Sentences, St Louis Steamers, Patricia Karvelas Net Worth, Colorado Springs Precipitation 2019,